
03
How the industry actually works
Conflicts, commissions, retrocessions, and the captain's role at the centre of it. Said plainly.
The first thing a new owner often learns, months after the first contract is signed, is that the structure of the market places most of the people around the acquisition on the other side of the table. The broker who walked them around shipyards in Viareggio and Vlissingen, introduced the captain candidates, and recommended the law firm, the surveyor, and the management company was paid by the seller. In some transactions, the same broker represented the seller. The questions that would have raised this are not in the standard first-time buyer's kit.
This is not bad practice so much as the shape of the market. The alternative, where the buyer pays their own adviser at the rates such advice costs, feels expensive at the moment of the decision and cheap years later, looking back from a second yacht.
The two parallel commission norms
A typical brokerage sale of a 40-metre yacht for EUR 28 million moves between EUR 1.4 million and EUR 2.8 million in commissions, depending on which of two parallel norms is applied. Both are presented as "the standard" by the brokers using them, although they are not the same.
The US norm, aligned with the International Yacht Brokers Association (IYBA), is a flat 10 percent of gross sale price, paid by the seller. On a USD 50 million sale, that is USD 5 million. The Mediterranean Yacht Brokers Association (MYBA) sliding scale is 10 percent on the first USD 10 million, 5 percent on the second, 2.5 percent above. On a USD 50 million sale, that is USD 2.25 million. The seller does not always know which is being applied. The buyer almost never knows. The 4 to 5 percent of gross sale price typically captured by the buyer's broker, paid out of the seller's commission pool, is the same arithmetic from either base.
Practitioner commentary attributed to Cromwell Littlejohn (Northrop & Johnson) at industry events acknowledges that brokers can be reluctant to publish reduced commission rates on the central-agency listing, on the basis that disclosure may suppress buyer-broker viewings. The system, on his published reading, can reward opacity. Offered here as practitioner opinion; Northrop & Johnson itself states a commitment to full transparency.
Dual agency and the IYBA standard form
The IYBA Purchase and Sale Agreement, the standard contract used in most US-jurisdiction yacht transactions, contains a dual-agency clause that constitutes pre-emptive consent. Signing the standard form means the buyer and seller have already agreed that the broker may act for both sides, with carve-outs (the broker cannot tell the seller the buyer's maximum, cannot tell the buyer the seller's minimum). The standard form normalises a fiduciary impossibility.
In January 2025, Judge K. Michael Moore of the US District Court for the Southern District of Florida dismissed Ya Mon Expeditions LLC v. IYBA et al., a Sherman Act class action alleging conspiracy to fix commissions across the industry. The dismissal was on procedural grounds: insufficient evidence of explicit agreement to fix. The pleadings, which remain on file, document a transaction in which both sides of a sale were brokered by the same firm, with the firm collecting both sides of the 10 percent commission. The case did not establish illegality. It did establish that the practice is sufficiently common and sufficiently questioned to generate federal litigation.
California requires explicit dual-agency disclosure. Florida operates under transactional-brokerage rules where full agency duties to either side are diluted by default. The UK Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) does not regulate yacht sales because they are not a regulated financial instrument; the Maritime and Coastguard Agency (MCA) does not regulate brokerage commissions. There is no financial regulator in any major jurisdiction that supervises yacht brokerage conduct.
Camper & Nicholsons and Fincantieri
Camper & Nicholsons was acquired in 2014 by Coliseum Services SA, a Geneva-based vehicle subsequently renamed the 1782 Group. In May 2015, the Italian state-controlled shipbuilder Fincantieri acquired a 15 percent minority stake via a capital increase, with Coliseum Services remaining the majority shareholder. Lai Sun Development Company Limited, the Hong Kong-listed conglomerate, subsequently acquired majority control through the 1782 Group structure.
C&N therefore has, on its capitalisation table, an Italian shipbuilder that builds yachts C&N then sells. Disclosure of the relationship is not consistently made when C&N markets a Fincantieri-built yacht; the conflict is structural and permanent.
On 28 May 2026, Lai Sun signed to sell an initial 80 percent of C&N International to Wave Expandary Limited at an enterprise value of EUR 50 million, approximately twelve times management EBITDA on FY2025 (C&N revenue HK$270.7 million, net profit after tax HK$13.1 million). The buyer is guaranteed by Sea Expandary Limited, the vertically integrated yacht-industry platform announced in February 2026 by JD.com founder Richard Liu Qiangdong with a stated USD 700 million commitment across R&D, manufacturing, brokerage, and after-sales, focused on new-energy propulsion and the Guangdong-Hong Kong-Macao Greater Bay Area. Put and call options govern the remaining 20 percent from 31 December 2027, each estimated at EUR 9.135 million. Completion is subject to regulatory and shareholder approvals with a long stop of 30 September 2026; Paolo Casani remains CEO. Whether Fincantieri's 15 percent survives the transaction is not disclosed in the announcement.
The structural conflict the chapter named with Fincantieri is compounded rather than resolved. C&N's incoming controlling shareholder operates its own yacht manufacturing platform alongside the brokerage. The question whether disclosure is made when C&N markets a Sea Expandary hull is the same question the Fincantieri arrangement already raised, with a larger and more recent counterparty. The EUR 50 million enterprise value at roughly twelve times EBITDA is itself a useful segment comparable for the yacht-services valuation buyers do not typically see.
The Fincantieri example is the cleanest, not the only one. In November 2025 the US private equity firm Ancient (Alexander Klabin) acquired a strategic stake in Burgess, the firm's first outside investor in 50 years. Fraser and Northrop & Johnson sit inside MarineMax (NYSE: HZO), acquired 2019 and 2020. Denison Yachting was sold by the Denison family to OneWater Marine (NASDAQ: ONEW) in April 2022 and merged into the OneWater Yacht Group in September 2025.
Independent founder-led houses are now the minority by deal volume. PE owners require EBITDA growth, which incentivises cross-selling more services per yacht, capturing recurring management and refit spend, and consolidating commission pools, with the result that the "free advice" model is more profitable under PE ownership rather than less.
Retrocession economics
Referral fees from yacht-management firms, refit yards, paint contractors, electronics integrators, insurance brokers, finance providers, crew agencies, and class societies to the introducing broker are an open secret. OnboardOnline's legal column states the rule plainly: referral fees are legal only if disclosed, must be reflected in the closing statement to seller and buyer, and undisclosed payments to a captain are potentially criminal. No equivalent rule compels the brokerage house to disclose retrocessions on ongoing services to its yacht-owning client.
On a EUR 4 million repaint, a 5 percent retrocession is EUR 200,000. On a EUR 5 million annual management contract, a 10 percent introductory retrocession is EUR 500,000 in year one. The numbers are not small. They also do not appear on any invoice to the owner, because the broker is not invoicing the owner; the owner pays the yard, the management company, and the paint contractor, and the retrocessions flow inside the supplier's books.
Particular firms are not named here because the practice is industry-wide. When the buyer's adviser earns more because the buyer spends more with counterparties the adviser has steered them toward, the adviser's incentives are not aligned with the buyer's. That arrangement is the default of the superyacht industry.
The same observation appears in Hein Velema's published comment on new build broker arrangements, May 2026:
In a new build, the broker often represents the owner in the deal, but the broker is being paid by the shipyard. That is a mismatch. Owners generally know that a broker works on commission. They do not always know how much, or on what.
An experienced broker, well-aligned and well-led, noticeably reduces execution risk on a transaction the buyer would not otherwise close cleanly. They walk inventory the buyer has not had the time to walk, read paint and machinery and pricing patterns from the inside, and know which sellers are negotiating and which are window-shopping. Owners are by construction hard to reach; the broker who carries that relationship has earned it.
If a broker has access to a client, that means he has value. It is very difficult to get the ear of an owner, and where you have it, you have added value.
None of the structural critique above applies to that work. The critique applies to the undisclosed incentives that travel alongside the commission, and to the role ambiguity that asks one firm to answer to both sides of the same transaction. Disclosure and clearly named roles solve most of it; their absence is what the chapter has documented.
Chris Cecil-Wright, founder of Cecil Wright, on the panel at the Superyacht Investor London forum in April 2026, located the broker's value precisely:
We operate in the 'information and confidence delivery' part of the ecosystem. All the deals we're doing offline are the ones where the value is. AI doesn't know the nuance of the deal.
Held to that frame, the broker the buyer wants is the one paid to deliver information and confidence transparently — not the one paid to keep both quietly opaque.
The captain's role in the structure
The captain is the most consequential hire an owner makes, and often the first. They are involved in yacht selection, survey, sea trial, crew recruitment, management company choice, supplier relationships, and the day-to-day operating budget. They also bring a career and a network: prior owners, yards, brokers, relationships that pre-date the current employment. The role concentrates a great deal of authority and trust in a single individual, and the owner is well served by mapping the captain's wider professional background before the appointment rather than discovering it later.
If you accept a fee for giving out the work, how can you still audit the quality of the result you are directly responsible for? You can't. So for me it's not really a question.
A useful framework for the interview: the captain who pushes back, asks hard questions about intended use, and is sceptical of the timeline is the one to keep talking to. Easy agreement in the first three meetings is pleasant in the room and not necessarily the strongest indicator of the right hire.
What independence means
Several firms describe themselves as independent. The word does meaningful work in some cases and is decorative in others. The full six-element independence test is set out in chapter 9 and applied to the publisher on the colophon. The questions are: contingent earnings; equity or referral relationships; published counterparty list; transparent fees; appropriate professional indemnity; named, accountable principals.
The honest version of the conversation
For a reader in advance of a first acquisition, the practical version is this. Engage an independent adviser before any broker. Engage independent legal counsel, not the broker's preferred firm. Engage an independent surveyor, not the seller's. Pay all three directly. It is the cheapest insurance available. A party who objects to this arrangement has told you something useful about themselves.
The industry will absorb capital regardless of how many advisers a buyer hires. The question is whether it does so on terms the buyer has understood and chosen, or on terms the buyer discovers later.
Capt. Filippakis came to large-yacht command from a career in LNG and has led a complex refit and a subsequent pole-to-pole voyage on the owner-operated yacht he now commands. We put five questions to him on the captain's loyalty problem: the introduction route, the broker call, the referral-fee question, the disclosure rule, and the first conversation a first-time owner should have with a captain candidate. Answers are given on the record, lightly edited for typography.
When you are introduced to an owner, who has typically already introduced you? Broker, prior captain, recruitment agency, family office? How does the introduction route shape what happens next?
In my case, I had met the Owner randomly in person, and he was directly involved in operating his asset. It allowed a working — and personal — relationship to develop faster. The latter enhances loyalty.
However, I believe the layer of external recruiters and management companies between hiring brings a lot of merit in this aspect, because it will make your Captain personally accountable to more parties.
And with that layer usually comes a process that streamlines expectations for both sides and reduces the chance of a wrong hire. The heavy burden of carrying a reference from leading industry peers also plays a big part in how your Captain carries himself. It certainly does for me.
Tell me about a time a broker called you with a charter request, a yacht acquisition referral, or a supplier introduction. What did the relationship look like before that call, and what was implied by the request?
I've had both cold calls and acquaintances reaching out. It's a necessary part of a broker's life to source as many leads as possible, and I respect that.
In the same way, it's a necessary part on the Captain's side to manage that without endangering the Owner's reputation, his own, or his contacts.
Many times the requests are harmless — a simple introduction between acquaintances. Sometimes they come with caveats. Politely declining those without damaging the relationship is an art that each Captain has to master.
Have you been offered a referral fee, finder's commission, or any other contingent payment by a broker, yard, supplier, management company, or recruitment agency? Without naming the firm, what was offered, and what did you do?
It certainly has happened, and the fees would range widely.
I've left a very lucrative career on LNG for the privilege of leading remote expeditions. My grandfather was also a Captain, and following Greek tradition, I carry his exact name — which carries a certain weight in how I perceive my reputation in this industry.
And beyond that, I ask myself a simpler question: if you accept a fee for giving out the work, how can you still audit the quality of the result you are directly responsible for?
You can't. So for me it's not really a question.
The OnboardOnline legal column has stated the disclosure rule plainly: referral fees are legal only if disclosed. Is the disclosure rule observed in practice, or worked around?
Personally, I've never seen referral fees in a contract, but I also have never been in a situation where referral fees had to be implemented.
What would you tell a first-time owner to ask in the first conversation with a captain candidate to surface these incentives without making it adversarial?
I think this is one of the most difficult assessments to make in a single conversation, and the truth is you cannot fully make it — you confirm or refute it over the first year. But there is one question that opens the right door without being adversarial:
“Which brokers and yards do you have the strongest relationships with, and how did those relationships develop?”
It's a fair question. Any captain operating at this level has them, and a confident captain will answer specifically — he'll name people, say how he came to know them, describe what each is good at.
The candidate who goes vague, or who claims no strong relationships, is harder to read in a way that matters. Specificity is the tell. A captain who is comfortable being precise about his network is usually comfortable being precise about everything else, too — including what he chooses, and why.
Where the money goes in a typical brokerage transaction
On a EUR 28 m sale of a 40 m yacht, EUR 1.4 to 2.8 million moves in commissions depending on which of two parallel norms is applied. The buyer almost never knows which is in use. The structure, said plainly.
The two parallel commission norms
| Structure | Commission base | Commission paid |
|---|---|---|
| IYBA / US norm | Flat 10 percent of gross sale price, paid by the seller | EUR 2,800,000 |
| MYBA sliding scale | 10 percent on first EUR 10 m, 5 percent on second EUR 10 m, 2.5 percent above | EUR 1,950,000 |
| Buyer-broker share, typical | 4 to 5 percent of gross, paid out of the seller-side pool | EUR 1,120,000 to 1,400,000 |
Two parallel commission norms, on a EUR 28 m sale
The same yacht, the same buyer, the same seller — and a EUR 850,000 spread between which scale the brokers apply. The seller does not always know which is being used. The buyer almost never does.
Brokerage ownership concentration
- Camper & Nicholsons
1782 Group / Lai Sun Development; Fincantieri 15 percent minority since 2015; 80 percent stake sold to Wave Expandary Ltd (Sea Expandary, JD.com's Richard Liu) signed 28 May 2026 at EUR 50m EV (~12x EBITDA), pending regulatory clearance
- Burgess
Ancient (PE, founded 2021) acquired strategic stake October 2025
- Fraser
Inside MarineMax (NYSE: HZO) since 2019
- Northrop & Johnson
Inside MarineMax since 2020
- Denison Yachting
Sold to OneWater Marine (NASDAQ: ONEW) April 2022; merged into OneWater Yacht Group September 2025
Retrocession economy, indicative magnitudes
| Service | Typical scope | 5 to 10 percent retrocession |
|---|---|---|
| Repaint | EUR 4 m | EUR 200,000 to 400,000 |
| Annual management contract, year one | EUR 5 m | EUR 250,000 to 500,000 |
| Charter management commission share | EUR 2 m of charter revenue | EUR 100,000 to 200,000 |
| Insurance broker introduction | EUR 250 k premium | EUR 12,500 to 25,000 (per year) |
Regulatory coverage
- UK Financial Conduct Authority
Does not regulate yacht sales (not a regulated financial instrument)
- UK Maritime and Coastguard Agency
Does not regulate brokerage commissions
- California
Requires explicit dual-agency disclosure
- Florida
Transactional brokerage rules; full agency duties diluted by default
- IYBA Purchase and Sale Agreement
Pre-emptive consent to dual agency
- Ya Mon Expeditions LLC v. IYBA et al.
Dismissed January 2025 on procedural grounds; pleadings on file
- IYBA Purchase and Sale Agreement. Standard contract, dual-agency clause, pre-emptive consent.
- MYBA Memorandum of Agreement. Sliding-scale commission norm.
- Cromwell Littlejohn (Northrop & Johnson), Palm Beach Boat Show. On the record: the system actively rewards opacity.
- OnboardOnline legal column. On disclosure rules and undisclosed payments to captains.
- Ya Mon Expeditions LLC v. IYBA et al.. US District Court for Southern District of Florida; dismissed January 2025 by Judge K. Michael Moore on procedural grounds.
Disclosures worth having in writing.
A reference list of the structural questions to ask of any party introduced into the acquisition.
When a brokerage offers buyer support without an explicit fee, the work is paid for somewhere in the structure. The items below are where to ask.
The brokerage
The commission structure being applied (IYBA flat 10 percent, MYBA sliding scale), and the resulting fee.
Any dual agency on the transaction, documented in writing beyond the standard form clause.
The brokerage’s ownership structure (PE-backed, public-parent, founder-led, yard-tied).
Each ownership pattern carries different incentives.
Counterparty introductions
For each party the brokerage has introduced (lawyer, surveyor, management company, paint specialist, insurance broker, recruitment agency): the referral or retrocession arrangement, if any, and at what rate.
Written disclosure of every referral relationship and retrocession arrangement on every introduction.
Referral fees are legal only if disclosed (OnboardOnline legal column).
If disclosure is declined, a parallel adviser whose only role is to scan for and document the relationships.
Independent advisers document referral relationships as part of their standard scope.
The captain
The candidate’s introduction route (broker, seller, or independent agency engaged by the buyer).
Any prior commercial relationships with brokers, yards, suppliers, or management companies that might continue into employment.
The captain’s pay structure (straight salary, or any bonus, charter share, or referral-related elements).
The structural test
An understanding of which parties in the transaction would walk away from a deal that did not benefit the buyer.
The independent adviser, paid only by the buyer, is the party for whom this is structurally true.
At least one party in the transaction whose income is contingent only on the quality of advice given, not on the deal closing.
The page is designed to print onto a single A4. Require written answers from each counterparty. File with the closing documents.
Open the printable checklistGlossary terms in this chapter
Brokerage
The sale of an existing yacht through an intermediary. The seller pays the commission, typically 10 percent of the sale price, regardless of which broker introduces the buyer.
Central agency
A formal mandate by which a single broker is appointed by the seller to market the yacht. Other brokers can introduce buyers but only the central agent receives the listing-side commission.
Dual agency
When a single brokerage represents both buyer and seller in a transaction. The conflict of interest is structural and may not always be disclosed in writing.
Retrocession
A commission rebate paid quietly between counterparties, often from a yard or supplier back to a referring broker, captain, or management company. Frequently undisclosed.
Frequently asked
- Who pays the yacht broker commission?
- On a brokerage transaction, the seller pays the commission from the sale proceeds, regardless of which broker introduces the buyer. The buyer is not invoiced. The IYBA standard is a flat 10 percent of the sale price; MYBA uses a sliding scale. The structural consequence is that every party introduced through a brokerage is paid contingent on a closed transaction, which shapes incentives. The buyer's structural counterweight is an independent adviser whose income is not contingent on closing.
- What is dual agency in a yacht transaction?
- Dual agency is when a single brokerage represents both the buyer and the seller. It is permitted in most jurisdictions provided it is disclosed. The standard MYBA and IYBA agreements include a dual-agency clause that the buyer signs with the central agent. Disclosure beyond that boilerplate, including any retrocession arrangements with introducing parties, is typically not volunteered. Asking is the discipline. Buyers who want clean alignment engage a buyer-side adviser whose only role is the buyer's interest.
- What is a retrocession in yacht industry?
- A retrocession is a commission rebate paid quietly between counterparties, typically from a yard, supplier, or management company back to a referring broker, captain, or adviser. Retrocessions are legal in most jurisdictions provided they are disclosed. The structural problem is that disclosure is typically not volunteered. The OnboardOnline legal column has stated the position plainly. Asking each introduced party for written disclosure of every referral relationship and retrocession arrangement is the buyer's protection.
- Should I trust the captain's recommendation on broker, surveyor, or yard?
- A captain's recommendation merits the same disclosure question as any other. The captain may have prior commercial relationships with brokers, yards, suppliers, and management companies that continue into employment. The candidate's introduction route, prior commercial relationships, and pay structure (straight salary versus bonus, charter share, or referral-related elements) are all worth establishing in writing before the captain is hired. Captains who agree easily are pleasant in interview; the disciplined candidate asks the difficult questions.
“How the industry actually works,” The First Owner’s Reference, 1st Edition, 2026.
Foreland Marine, “How the industry actually works,” in The First Owner’s Reference, 1st Edition (2026), Chapter 03, https://firstownersreference.com/03-how-the-industry-works.